http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/ The Blog Of Andrew Dobrow Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:07:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-59 Noah David Simon Sat, 17 May 2008 04:26:43 +0000 http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-59 unless you have a friendfeed panopticons.... then your popping yourself back up... ff has more wholes in it then twitter... but for now at least it isn't crashing unless you have a friendfeed panopticons….
then your popping yourself back up…
ff has more wholes in it then twitter… but for now at least it isn’t crashing

]]> http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-49 Colin Walker » A static FriendFeed is a worthless FriendFeed. Fri, 16 May 2008 12:33:31 +0000 http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-49 [...] on Twitter just can’t. Conversation can quickly get lost in the Twitter stream but, as Andrew Dobrow says: The threading system of FriendFeed sets aside a little nook for each separate piece of [...] […] on Twitter just can’t. Conversation can quickly get lost in the Twitter stream but, as Andrew Dobrow says: The threading system of FriendFeed sets aside a little nook for each separate piece of […]

]]> http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-48 Noah David Simon Fri, 16 May 2008 08:32:22 +0000 http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-48 and the negative side to that is centralization. It would be a better marketing tool because ff centralizes conversations to one idea. This could be a bad thing. If a topic were to get started like say something controversial (ahem) a thread could really monopolize and the wouldn't be any way to stop it without blaming some guy who might of started a meme innocently enough. Not to mention of ff I noticed this blog post caught the attention of Robert Scoble, well of course if you have 5000 plus friends then ff would be for you because your threads will pop back in. On twitter I can get thrown out and back right into a scene pretty easily and in fact enjoy myself better with fewer followers and follows. Not so with friedfeed. With friedfeed if you become unpopular, assholes are forever. and the negative side to that is centralization.
It would be a better marketing tool because ff centralizes conversations to one idea. This could be a bad thing. If a topic were to get started like say something controversial (ahem) a thread could really monopolize and the wouldn’t be any way to stop it without blaming some guy who might of started a meme innocently enough. Not to mention of ff I noticed this blog post caught the attention of Robert Scoble, well of course if you have 5000 plus friends then ff would be for you because your threads will pop back in. On twitter I can get thrown out and back right into a scene pretty easily and in fact enjoy myself better with fewer followers and follows. Not so with friedfeed. With friedfeed if you become unpopular, assholes are forever.

]]> http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-47 Peety Fri, 16 May 2008 08:15:47 +0000 http://jerseysuburbia.com/2008/05/16/friendfeed-is-forever-twitter-lives-in-the-moment/#comment-47 I must confess, I have not been giving Friend Feed the attention it deserves. Thanks to you, I may give it a second chance. May the tweet force be with you and have a smashing week-end! I must confess, I have not been giving Friend Feed the attention it deserves. Thanks to you, I may give it a second chance. May the tweet force be with you and have a smashing week-end!

]]>